B.C. police inspector sues RCMP after being ‘violently’ tackled

Article content material

A high-ranking Port Moody police officer is suing two RCMP canine handlers after he was tackled by considered one of them and bitten by a police canine subsequent to his Surrey residence as they pursued a suspect, regardless of him repeatedly yelling “it wasn’t me, it wasn’t me.”

Article content material

Inspector Manjinder Singh Kaila, 55, who as soon as labored as a police canine handler, has filed a discover of civil declare in Vancouver Supreme Courtroom looking for unspecified damages, together with lack of incomes capability.

Article content material

And he desires aggravated damages as a result of he has “suffered distinctive public {and professional} humiliation, lack of dignity and disgrace as a senior member” of B.C.’s regulation enforcement group.

Kaila mentioned he’s somebody who had “devoted his total working lifetime to policing and public security.”

Kaila can also be looking for punitive damages — that are hardly ever awarded — as a result of common damages aren’t adequate to offer “retribution, deterrence and denunciation within the context of police brutality,” the declare states.

Article content material

Article content material

The assertion of declare names Const. Sarbjeet Singh, a Delta police officer who was working with the RCMP’s canine service on the time, and Const. Paul Baker, an RCMP member of the canine service, B.C.’s Solicitor Common Ministry and the Metropolis of Delta.

The incident two years in the past left Kaila with a chunk wound to his leg and calf that required 12 to 14 staples and left a everlasting scar, the writ mentioned. He additionally suffered ankle, calf, again and shoulder accidents and continues to undergo continual shoulder ache that requires ache administration and persevering with therapy, together with corticosteroid injections.

He additionally suffers from sleep disturbance and nightmares, post-traumatic stress dysfunction, nervousness, despair, disgrace and humiliation, in keeping with the writ.

Article content material

Kaila, a middle-aged, broad-shouldered male, was sporting a T-shirt, observe pants and sneakers whereas in his driveway and storage in Surrey round 9:45 p.m. on Could 29, 2021. He heard a crash and noticed a black pickup had landed on his neighbour’s garden. He noticed each a “slim, fair-skinned male,” possible white and about 19-25 years outdated, and a white feminine with blond hair operating down the driveway.

He noticed a flashlight within the distance and heard somebody yell cease, however didn’t see any police autos, lights or hear sirens or anybody establish themselves as police.

He went to his neighbour’s driveway and informed the feminine suspect to “simply cease” and he or she did, about 20 metres from him. Then he noticed three or 4 folks approaching with an unleashed German shepherd.

Article content material

The writ mentioned Kaila raised his arms to chest stage with palms out and yelled a number of instances “I’m not concerned, it wasn’t me, it wasn’t me.”

His head was turned to look at the canine and seconds later he was “violently tackled” by Baker, the writ alleges. Baker was on high of him and Kaila mentioned he didn’t battle with him or resist, however yelled, “it’s not me, what are you doing?”

He then heard Singh situation a command to the canine, “in direct response to which the canine bit and mauled the plaintiff’s left leg and calf.” Singh launched the canine’s chunk on his leg and the 2 officers ran off, leaving him “battered, bloodied and unable to bear any weight on his left ankle,” in keeping with the writ.

“Within the assault and the police canine assault, (Baker and Singh) deliberately battered the plaintiff,” it mentioned.

Article content material

They did not establish themselves as officers, to ascertain causes or possible grounds for the arrest and use of drive in opposition to Kaila and to watch that the canine had not recognized Kaila because the suspect and that the canine was “looking for the suspect’s airborne scent elsewhere.”

Additionally they failed to make use of non-violent instruments within the “wrongful” arrest and affordable care to make sure Kaila’s security and well-being and to warn him of the hazard posed by the police canine.

The writ additionally alleges the assault and canine assault violated Kaila’s constitution rights to life, liberty and safety and punitive damages are subsequently merited as a result of “severe violations of his Constitution rights, perpetrated by regulation enforcement whose obligation it’s to guard and serve the general public.”

Article content material

The assertion of declare additionally mentioned there could also be proof the assault and canine assault “constituted discrimination on the premise of race, color or ancestry and/or whether or not these batteries had been motivated by racial bias or racial profiling.”

The defendants have but to file a response and not one of the allegations have been proved in court docket.

Help our journalism: Our in-depth journalism is feasible due to the help of our subscribers. For simply $3.50 per week, you will get limitless, ad-lite entry to The Vancouver Solar, The Province, Nationwide Put up and 13 different Canadian information websites. Help us by subscribing right this moment: The Vancouver Solar | The Province.