Immigration minister defends border invoice’s restrictions

Article content material

OTTAWA — Safeguards have been written into the federal government’s border invoice to make sure civil rights and due course of are upheld in proposed immigration rules, Immigration Minister Lena Diab stated Wednesday.

Article content material

Critics and advocacy teams are calling the wide-ranging border safety laws a risk to civil liberties within the immigration and asylum system.

Article content material

Article content material

One proposed change within the laws would stop individuals from making asylum claims in the event that they’ve been in Canada for greater than a 12 months.

That change wouldn’t have an effect on purposes which have been submitted already however could be retroactive to June 3, assuming the invoice turns into legislation.

Diab stated there would nonetheless be alternatives for asylum seekers who’ve been in Canada for greater than a 12 months to make their case by measures like pre-removal threat assessments.

“There’s a number of purposes within the system and so that is will streamline it to make sure that these newcomers, or these individuals that basically want our safety and use the asylum system, are processed quicker,” she stated.

Article content material

Article content material

The 127-page invoice, unveiled Tuesday, would give authorities new powers to go looking mail and increase the Canadian Coast Guard’s position to incorporate safety actions.

There are a number of different immigration measures are within the invoice.

They embody giving authorities the facility to cancel or droop immigration paperwork for well being or nationwide safety causes, closing a loophole that permits individuals to make an asylum declare 14 days after crossing the U.S. land border, and permitting Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada to share the non-public info of immigrants and refugees with provincial and territorial governments.

Immigration lawyer Zool Suleman stated the information-sharing proposal poses a risk to the civil liberties of all Canadians.

Article content material

“All people thinks they don’t have anything to cover. You’d be amazed at how a lot we do need to conceal when it comes to the non-public lives that we lead on this nation and that we’ve got a proper to guide within the nation,” he stated.

“The true subject is that the federal government shouldn’t be delving into your non-public life until they’ve trigger. And so what this invoice is de facto doing is threatening the civil liberties of all people in Canada.”

Diab stated the laws contains various safeguards to guard private info. She stated the purpose is to streamline information-sharing between branches of presidency that course of immigration, citizenship and passport purposes.

“These applications can’t share info collectively. So this a minimum of will give us that capacity to do this, but in addition share info with the provinces and territories the place the necessity arises,” she stated.

Article content material

Diab stated information-sharing preparations with provincial and territorial our bodies could be outlined in agreements stating which info may be shared and when.

“Most Canadians most likely assume that is the smart factor to do and actually most likely assume it exists already. Nicely, it doesn’t,” Diab stated.

Diab stated the ultimate resolution on cancelling or suspending immigration paperwork within the occasion of a well being or public security emergency could be made by cupboard.

“I believe individuals, Canadians, ought to really feel secure that we’re placing all these safeguards in. However once more, as I stated, it’s all a part of defending our nation and defending our system,” Diab stated.

Suleman stated he has apprehensive a few authorities giving itself this sort of energy because the 2001 Immigration and Refugee Safety Act turned legislation.

Article content material

“Individuals had predicted that that is the route wherein the federal government would go when it was passing this framework laws. And what we discover greater than twenty years later is it’s precisely the place the federal government has gone,” he stated.

“They’ve taken on increasingly more authority for themselves with much less and fewer safeguards for refugees and immigrants.”

The laws says that some asylum instances — equivalent to these of migrants crossing by land from the U.S. — will not be despatched to the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada for assessment.

“You may be subjected to a a lot decrease stage of assessment and far decrease ranges of safeguards. Basically, what the federal government is making an attempt to do for a lot of, many refugee claimants is transfer to a paper assessment foundation, not an oral assessment foundation to find out their claims,” Suleman stated.

Article content material

The federal government has been making an attempt to chop the backlog in immigration and refugee purposes and is lowering the variety of everlasting and momentary residents being admitted to Canada.

Roxham Street in Quebec turned a focus for the immigration debate through the first Donald Trump presidency, with 1000’s of individuals claiming asylum after crossing the Canadian border onto the small rural street, about 50 kilometres south of Montreal.

Extra lately, the federal government has reported a rise within the variety of worldwide college students making asylum claims when their visas expire.

Diab stated the asylum system can’t be used as a shortcut to immigration.

“If you wish to immigrate to Canada, we’ve got guidelines. Now we have processes. Please use them,” she stated.

— With information from Jim Bronskill

Article content material