BAKU, Azerbaijan, August 19. The trial of
Armenian citizen Ruben Vardanyan, charged underneath the Prison Code
of the Republic of Azerbaijan with crimes towards peace and
humanity, battle crimes, terrorism, financing terrorism, and different
severe offenses, continued on August 19, Pattern experiences.
The open court docket listening to, held on the Baku Army Courtroom and
presided over by Decide Zeynal Aghayev, with judges Anar Rzayev and
Jamal Ramazanov (reserve choose Gunel Samadova), ensured that the
accused was supplied with an interpreter in Russian, his most popular
language, and a protection legal professional of his personal selecting.
Earlier than the questioning, Decide Zeynal Aghayev defined the authorized
rights and obligations to the victims and their authorized heirs
taking part within the trial for the primary time.
Subsequently, the lawyer of the accused Ruben Vardanyan, Avraam
Berman, appealed to the court docket and expressed his objection to the
judges listening to the case.
R. Vardanyan supported the objection.
Zeynal Aghayev said that the protection had repeatedly submitted
objections of the identical content material, including that no new provisions have been
introduced within the present objection. Primarily based on the above, the
objection was not accepted for consideration.
Afterwards, Avraam Berman requested a confidential assembly with
his shopper. The choose granted the request and the court docket
adjourned.
Following the adjournment, the court docket heard statements from the
victims and their authorized heirs.
The authorized inheritor of sufferer, Amin Hasanov – his father, Ilgar
Hasanov, said that his son was killed on account of gunfire
opened by remnants of the Armenian military and unlawful Armenian armed
teams in Aghdara.
Responding to the questions from public prosecutor Fuad Musayev,
the authorized inheritor of sufferer Ujal Babashov, his father Narbala
Babashov, reported that his son misplaced his life resulting from enemy gunfire
in Khojavand.
The authorized inheritor of sufferer Huseyn Nasibov, his father Afgan
Nasibov, said in his testimony that his son misplaced his life as a
results of enemy provocation within the Shusha-Khankendi course.
Answering questions from Tugay Rahimli, Assistant to the
Prosecutor Basic for Particular Assignments, the sufferer Najmaddin
Guliyev’s authorized inheritor – his father, Natig Guliyev, famous that his
son was killed on account of gunfire opened by remnants of the
Armenian military and unlawful Armenian armed teams within the course of
Aghdara.
In his testimony, Ramazan Huseynzade’s authorized inheritor, his father
Hamdulla Huseynov, famous that his son misplaced his life on account of
enemy gunfire in Khojaly.
Ramil Guliyev emphasised that he was wounded on account of an
explosion brought on by a mortar shell fired by the enemy in Kalbajar.
Answering questions from public prosecutor Vusal Abdullayev, the
sufferer stated that two individuals close by have been killed at the moment.
Elnur Hasanov stated that he was injured because of the explosion of a
mine planted by the enemy whereas grazing sheep within the Hasangaya
village of Tartar district.
In his testimony, sufferer Barzani Atayev stated he was wounded by
the hearth opened by the remnants of the Armenian armed forces and
the unlawful Armenian armed detachments, whereas evacuating the
wounded in Aghdara.
Sufferer Isgandar Huseynov reported being wounded by the enemy
artillery hearth, including that Samir Karimov and Ali Heydarov have been
additionally injured within the incident.
Sufferer Halay Tahirli testified that he was wounded by an enemy
grenade in Kalbajar district. Responding to the questions from
Nasir Bayramov, head of the division for the defence of state
accusations on the Prosecutor Basic’s Workplace, the sufferer famous
that Kanan Nasibov was killed throughout the incident, whereas Eltakin
Hasanov sustained accidents to varied elements of his physique.
One other sufferer Elgun Isamyilli claimed that he was wounded by a
gunshot throughout the hearth opened by the remnants of Armenian armed
forces and unlawful Armenian armed detachments within the Khanabad
village of Khojaly district, with Khalid Alifov and Babak Ahmadli
additionally wounded throughout the incident.
Sufferer Khalid Alifov claimed that he was wounded by the enemy
hearth within the Khojavand district. Answering the inquiry from state
prosecutor Tarana Mammadova, he famous that Ahliyar Muradov and
Elgun Ismayilli have been wounded, whereas Davud Giyasli was killed throughout
the incident.
Victims Nusrat Karimov, Rasul Ramazanov, Aziz Gurbanov, Jeyhun
Aliyev, Elmaddin Piriyev, Yusif Mammadov, Elnur Piriyev, Ruslan
Mirzayev, Mahammad Piriyev, Samir Khammadli, Mohlat Idrisov, Huseyn
Nurullayev, Ravan Ahmadov, Tural Isayev, famous that they have been
wounded on account of the enemy provocations.
Different victims, particularly Elvin Muradov, Maharram Malikov, Ilkin
Ahmadov, Azer Hamzayev, Elmaddin Hajizada, Hikmat Jabiyev, Safiyar
Mammadli, Orkhan Sadigli, talked about that they have been wounded by the
enemy hearth in Aghdara.
In response to questions from Vusal Aliyev, senior assistant to
the Prosecutor Basic, sufferer Rashad Ganbarov testified that he
was injured in an explosion of the artillery shell fired by the
remnants of the Armenian armed forces and unlawful Armenian armed
detachments in Khojavand, including that Murad Arzullayev and Javid
Aliyev have been killed throughout the incident.
Sufferer Nurlan Abdullayev claimed that he was wounded by the
enemy hearth in Aghdara.
Sufferer Rahil Dovlatov emphasised that he was wounded because of the
explosion of a landmine planted by the Armenian armed forces.
Sufferer Imran Mammadov stated he was wounded by the enemy hearth in
Khankendi.
Sufferer Gunduz Amoyev said that he was wounded on account of
the enemy provocation in Khojavand district.
Sufferer Eyvaz Huseynov underlined that he was injured in an
artillery shell explosion in Aghdam, fired by the remnants of the
Armenian armed forces and Armenian unlawful armed detachments.
Sufferer Elvin Jabbarov claimed that he was wounded by the enemy
hearth within the Aghdara-Khojaly course.
Rahim Gardashov said {that a} shell fired by the remnants of the
Armenian military and unlawful Armenian armed teams hit the automobile he was
driving in Aghdara, leading to accidents to him and different
individuals.
Toghrul Mehraliyev famous that he suffered a head harm from the
enemy hearth in Kalbajar.
Majid Safarov stated he was wounded because of the explosion of a mine
planted by the Armenian armed forces within the Zangilan district.
Izzat Dadashli talked about that he was injured by the enemy hearth
within the Khojavand district, including that he suffered a head harm
from the artillery hearth hitting his automobile throughout evacuation.
The forensic medical examination experiences of the mine victims and
different victims – Amid Asadov, Charkaz Guliyev, Oktay Alishov, Elshan
Khalilov, Vugar Zulfugarli, Khayal Abdullayev, Ilham Salmanov,
Dilavar Shukurov, Rovshan Alizada, Mehman Guliyev, Guloghlan
Mirzaliyev, Bahruz Nasirov, Elnur Abbaszada, Khanlar Aslanov, Safar
Aliyev and others – have been introduced in court docket.
The forensic phonoscopic and forensic explosion technical
examination experiences have been additionally introduced in court docket.
The subsequent court docket session is scheduled for August 26.
Ruben Vardanyan faces a number of expenses underneath the Prison Code
of the Republic of Azerbaijan, together with Articles 100.1, 100.2
(planning, getting ready, initiating, and waging a battle of aggression),
107 (deportation and compelled displacement of the inhabitants), 109
(persecution), 110 (forcible disappearance of individuals), 112
(deprivation of liberty opposite to worldwide regulation), 113
(torture), 114.1 (mercenary exercise), 115.2 (violation of the legal guidelines
and customs of warfare), 116.0.1, 116.0.2, 116.0.10, 116.0.11,
116.0.16, 116.0.18 (violation of worldwide humanitarian regulation
norms throughout an armed battle), 120.2.1, 120.2.3, 120.2.4,
120.2.7, 120.2.11, 120.2.12 (intentional homicide), 29.120.2.1,
29.120.2.3, 29.120.2.4, 29.120.2.7, 29.120.2.11, 29.120.2.12
(tried intentional homicide), 192.3.1 (unlawful entrepreneurship),
214.2.1, 214.2.3, 214.2.4 (terrorism), 214-1 (financing of
terrorism), 218.1, 218.2 (creation of a legal group), 228.3
(unlawful acquisition, switch, sale, storage, transportation, and
possession of firearms, ammunition, explosives, and units),
270-1.2, 270-1.4 (acts threatening aviation security), 278.1
(forcible seizure or retention of energy, forcible change of the
constitutional construction of the state), 279.1, 279.2, 279.3
(creation of armed formations not supplied for by regulation), and 318.2
(unlawful crossing of the state border of the Republic of
Azerbaijan).
